• Contacto
  • Conexión


Weak state, no law, weak consensus in Guatemala

In a highly polarized environment, the failure to establish a national law to regulate consulta previa has left the process in the hands of local communties’ consultas populares, with dubious legal authority.

ALTHOUGH THEY constitute 40 percent of Guatemala’s population, Indigenous Guatemalans face great inequality in terms of access to health, education, housing and—most critically—political representation. In 1995, the Guatemalan Constitutional Court asked Congress to approve and ratify International Labour Organization Convention 169 (ilo 169). Ratifi ed on June 5, 1996, the Convention was elevated to the category of law, committing the Guatemalan government to adapt national legislation in compliance with it. The Guatemalan government has since attempted to pass regulation on consulta previa numerous times, but has not yet succeeded.2 In 2011, with the goal of determining how consultations should be carried out, who should participate, and the degree to which the consultations would be binding, the administration of then President Álvaro Colom proposed a regulation intended to ensure the adoption of the norm—the Reglamento para el proceso de Consulta del Convenio 169 de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo sobre Pueblos Indígenas y Tribales en Países Independientes (Regulation for the consultation process of ilo Convention 169 on Indigenous and tribal peoples in independent countries).

Descargar Americas Quarterly

Spring 2014

PDF - 1.7 MB

Las opiniones y conslusiones expresadas en el siguiente artículo son de exclusiva responsabilidad del autor y no necesariamente reflejan la posición del CETRI.